Skip to main content

The "G" Word



This week I had a meeting to discuss an Enrichment Program for gifted and talented students at my school.  When discussing who to include, the question was asked: “What sort of gifts are we talking about?  Sporting, music, or whatever?”  The outcome of the meeting was that the program should be extended to include middle and lower ability kids too, because it had value to all students.

ARRGGGHH!!!  I don’t know why we are so afraid to use the term “gifted” as it relates to intellectual giftedness!  And why do we feel anxious about providing gifted kids with education that meets their needs?

When we use the word “gifted” to describe children or students, there are many around us that find that term a little uncomfortable and indeed confusing.  In fact, many people are reluctant to use the term at all, because they feel it is suggesting that children who are not gifted are somehow of less value.

“All children are gifted, in their own way” is a statement we hear often from those who feel uncomfortable with the g-word.  Perhaps they are confusing “gifts” with “strengths”.  All of us have at least one area in which we can do better or enjoy more than others.  But all of us are not tall.  All of us are not the fastest runners.  All of us are not gifted!

I love this presentation by Michael C Thompson Are All Children Gifted?.

Perhaps if we viewed intellectual giftedness as being an issue of need, rather than one of worth, we could feel more comfortable using the term.  If students are gifted in an area, be it sporting, fine arts, social leadership or intellectual pursuits, then those students have different needs from most of their peers and we need to respond appropriately to those needs.  Maybe we need to rethink the term "special needs" to include the other end of the bell curve too.

Back to the enrichment program...there are plenty of opportunities in school for talented sportspeople and musicians.  I don’t see how opening up enrichment opportunities that are meant to be for GATs kids helps serve them.  I like Passow’s criteria for judging the suitability of curriculum for gifted learners:
1.       Would all learners want to be involved in such learning experiences?
2.       Could all students participate in such learning experiences?
3.       Should all children be expected to succeed in such learning experiences?

If the answer to these questions is “yes”, then the “enrichment” course is not sufficiently differentiated for gifted learners.

I left the meeting feeling frustrated and disappointed.  I also felt that until the majority of educators aren’t afraid to use the G-word and they truly “get” what gifted kids need, then my kids won’t be part of that education system, because I can do a better job at home.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I see...

We've had a couple of interesting weeks here. Video Boy has inherited his mother's shocking vision - he has myopia (commonly known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness). It occurs when the eyes focus light in front of the retina, leading to unfocussed vision.


Close up is usually OK, but distance vision is pretty fuzzy:


For me, even the couple would have been blurry! I was "medically blind" which meant I got my optometrist fees covered by Medicare (yay!).

So, Video Boy has had glasses for a couple of years now - he has broken one pair and then lost the replacement pair (grrr) and so for a couple of months, his world has looked like the picture on the right...and he was squinting to watch TV, read signs, pretty much all the time.
So, we went off to the optometrist last week to get us some new glasses!
The optometrist is up on all the latest research - with Wombat Girl, we bought a software program with special "lenses" and she had to do a practice session…

Creating order from chaos...

We have been diving headlong into an amazing rabbit trail of maths, and science and art and if I don't share with you some of these thoughts and experiences and links they will be lost forever like much of the mists swirling through my brain!


And there is SOOO much good stuff whirring through my brain that I don't know where to logically start and how to group it all so it might make some sense, so instead, I think I will just let you follow our story - our rabbit trail that led to so much good stuff...and maybe, you will like some of it too!

After viewing Vi Hart's diatribe on parabolas, the kids were keen to actually graph some parabolas. But before we actually got to that, Hubby wanted see the video, so we watched it again, and that led us to reviewing the ones on spirals and fibonacci:



As we were watching, Video Boy grabbed the graph paper (because you always have spare graph paper lying around, don't you?) and started experimenting with the fibonacci spirals shown…

52 Ancestors - So Far Away

This week's #52ancestorsin52weeks is Father's Day - but of course, it's not Father's Day in Australia, so I'm going to do the theme we had a couple of weeks ago when I was away - So Far Away.

When you first start doing your family tree, it's exciting to see how "far back" you can go with your branches. Until last weekend, the furthest back on my direct line was Benjamin Broome, my 9th great-grandfather born in 1646 in Kidderminster, Worcestershire, England (grandfather of John Broom in my carpet story), which I thought was a long way back!

Last weekend, I was searching back to see if I could see a link between the Freemans on my Dad's side and the Freemans on my Mum's side (spoiler alert - not yet). Anyway, I was having a search on Joseph Freeman (my 5th great-grandfather born in Gloucestershire, England in 1765) and his wife - Sarah Arkell (my 5th great-grandmother also from Gloucestershire, England, born in 1767). Well, I had her father John…